Philips CD304MKII
CDM-1 transport, TDA1540 DAC
Philips CD880
CDM-1 MK2 transport, TDA1541A s1 DAC
Philips CD960
CDM-1 transport, TDA 1541 DAC
Marantz CD94
CDM-1 transport, 1x TDA 1541 DAC
Philips CD104
CDM-1 transport, TDA 1540 DAC
Marantz CD80
CDM-1 MK2 transport, 2x TDA 1541 S1 DAC
Marantz CD94 MKII
CDM-1 specially selected transport (better tolerances?),
2x TDA 1541 S1 DAC
Marantz CD74
CDM-1 transport, 2x TDA1540P DAC
This player looks somewhat like a Philips CD304MKII internally (The CD74 uses the 14bit TDA1540 and the CD304 uses the 16bit TDA1541. The CD74 is from the same generation as the CD104/304 (MKI) but has a pressed steel chassis instead of cast zinc and in fact not a single board in common with the Philips players. It does sound a bit like it, but better. It has the same kind of solidity and drive but with a smoother presentation and a more refined treble. Inside are two transformers: a big one behind the transport and a smaller one in the front on the right, behind the front panel. Also on the outside of the rear is a big power filter.
Marantz CD85
CDM-1 mkII transport, TDA1541A S1 DAC
Inside Pics of Philips and Marantz CD players
These players with their massive cast-iron swing-arm glass-lense mechanisms still produce excellent sound and are virtually indestructible. Here are some inside pics from a few Philips and Marantz players that I still have or have owned. There's also an extensive review in which all these players are compared to each other
For a complete overview of all CDM transports, go to this page:
Also see the Timelines for a complete overview:
Marantz CD94 above Philips CD880. The CD94MKII has very similar looks, although early models had a big, ugly badge on the drawer.
Marantz CD12LE
CDM-1 transport, TDA 1541 S1 DAC.
Marantz CD11LE
CDM-4MD transport, 2x TDA 1547 DAC.
This is currently one of my favorite Marantz players and I even prefer it sometimes to my Levinson no.390S.
Marantz CD84
CDM-1 transport, 2x TDA1540P DAC
This player looks exactly like the CD74 and uses the same basic components. Only upon closer inspection small differences become clear, such as different capacitors on the DAC board, different colour wires, different colour power button bar and other plastics in different colours. But the main difference remains that the CD84 has IR remote control, which the CD74 lacks. However, all it lacks is the IR receiver itself; everything else is already in place. Its sound however is where the biggest difference is: the CD74 sounds upbeat, fast, dynamic but a bit rough and the CD84 sounds smooth, full, relaxed and a bit dull. I did some circuitboard-swapping between the two with very interesting results.
See this extensive comparison for a closer inspection of these two near-identical players and a report on the audible differences.
Philips CD951
CDM-9/65 transport, TDA 1547 DAC.
Solid, confident, rhythmic, with fast and articulate bass, while retaining fluidity and airyness: it may not be the smoothest or creamiest, most emotional Philips player but it is still an entertaining listen.
Philips CD614
CDM-4/19 transport, TDA 1543 DAC.
Despite being 99% pure plastic, this is a non-synthetic sounding, highly entertaining player: open, fresh, fluid, smooth, refined and above all: musical! In stock form it is a bit lightweight in the bass and lacks solidity but even then it still sounds very, very nice. It is just very unfatiquing without tipping over into super-creamyness. It is a good balance between the classic and modern sound. With damping pads applied, IEC inlet installed and headphones disconnected it sounds much more solid and colourful and really becomes THE cheap player to have.
Find out all about classic and current Jeff Rowland equipment
Streaming, USB, Firewire,
Computer Audio
Current and Classic CD players, Cables, Accessories and more
Galleries, timelines & interiors of fascinating classic equipment
Your banner could be in one of these top section squares!
Info, Tips, Tricks and Insights
How to optimise your system