Sound Quality
Cold from the box, unoptimised and with standard powercord, the Linn surprised me with its super-smooth, velvety sound. What happened to the clean and dry, matter-of-fact sound that I came to associate with the Linn House Sound? Not present in the Klimax DS. I base my prejudices on experiences with various Linn components but have to admit that I haven't had many in my system. The most notable was the Unidisk 1.1, which I found to be impressively accurate, rhythmic and articulate, but rather dry and not very involving. How different the Klimax DS is! During my first hours with it I was almost in a state of disbelief for its creamy smoothness and I played many, many songs, until it started to become clear that everything I played had this sameyness about it, all music sounded creamy and at some point, this luxuriousness became tiresome and I started to long for a more powerful delivery. That's when I realised that all this time I had been listening to the Klimax DS with my trusty Transparent Ultra XLR cables in place and although these cables almost always work very well, some components I had over for a visit were less happy with them. And so the cable swapping began.
Interlink Optimisation
At first I tried the Klimax with its supplied standard powercord and the XLR interlinks I always use: Transparent Ultra XL. But because I knew from experience that not all source components like the "network" boxes on the interlink cables, I swapped to relatively affordable Cardas Quadlink 5C. The Accuphase DP400 for example sounded decidedly undynamic and restrained with this cable while my Levinson components are happy as a camper with this cable. It's probably to do with the output stage and its capability to drive low-ish impedances. But let's get back to the Klimax, now connected with Cardas Quadlink 5C. Now here's a difference you could call night and day!
Interlink Optimisation - Cardas Quadlink 5C
All of a sudden the sound opened up, the bass snapped into focus and became very articulate, the midrange went from creamy smooth to utterly natural and luckily the treble remained smooth, fluid and extended. In retrospect, the Klimax DS now reminded me of how the Unidisk 1.1 had sounded, minus its dryness. Again I played for hours at end, marvelling at the Linn's extremely finely layered soundstage, its subtle microdetailing and the free-flowing soundstage that filled the room in an entirely inoffensive manner.
Just like with Jeff Rowland components, you hear everything, the smallest whispers, and decay seems eternal, but this enormous amount of detail never makes the music tip over into agression or forwardness. Dynamics are impressive, not in a "blown out of your seat" kind of way, but again much like in the case of Jeff Rowland, not as much in macrodynamics but in microdynamics. The Linn seems to have super high resolution, sometimes making 44khz files sounding like 96khz. Don't think for a moment that the Linn is compressed or undynamic though, as this really isn't the case. Rather the Linn is quiet when the music needs it to be and loud when the music needs it to be. It isn't in constant shouting mode, like some other components that initially sound impressive but grow tiresome after a while.
Like the Rowlands, the Linn is always polite and well-behaved. But also like the Rowlands, the Linn can be a little too reticent in the bass. Now, regular readers know that I love my bass and I have admitted on various occasions that the players that I like a lot, often have bigger bass than most other players. So this has to be seen a a relative something. But compared to the PS Audio PWD and the Levinson 390S, the Linn's bass seems a little underpowered. Mind you, it isn't exactly lacking bass and the Klimax DS' bass actually goes deep and is both smooth and articulate, but it can lack some drive and body in comparison. This is the same for many Rowland components I have and have tried. And just like with the Rowlands, you just need to apply some TLC (tender love and care) in optimising the circumstances for the Linn.
Interlink Optimisation - Cardas Hexlink Golden 5C
While the Quadlink matched nicely with the Klimax, it also took away a big portion of the smooth creamyness as well as making the Linn sound a litttle too much "Linn" for my taste. Depending on your stance you could also call it very neutral, but me, I like some more fullness, more meat on the bones so to say. So in came the Cardas Hexlink Golden 5C. A mounthful, but a cable to be reckoned with as it was the brand's previous best cable, followed later by the Colden Cross and Golden Reference. The funny thing about Cardas cables is the difference between them. Golden Cross and Golden Reference actually sound a lot alike: smooth, creamy, a little rounded. Quadlink is very different, much tighter and drier. Hexlink is like a mixture: neither dry or lacking meat on the bones nor overly smooth and creamy. It was the Hexlink that paired best with the DS. It had the best bass, now fuller and more forceful than with the other two cables, but it also fleshed out the midrange, making it more solid and more real. The treble now was definitely drier and overall the DS sounded less smooth, but overall this felt like the best match thus far. I have yet to try out Cardas Golden Reference interlinks. Before I found them too full and creamy, and too shut in compared to the Transparent Ultra XL's, but because the Klimax is so very open and detailed, maybe the Golden Reference will be the ultimate match. Once I have carried out this test, this section will be updated.